a5c7b9f00b The great warriors of history are examined for fantasy combat simulations. Throughout history, there have been great warriors who have made their mark in battle, but how they could have matched up against each other is a mystery. This series endeavors to solve that mystery with various matchups of such warrior classes. With a systematic examination of their physical and cultural qualities, training and weapons, a field of experts strive to find the real facts of such warriors. When the research is compete, each episode ends with a simulated battle to see who is truly the deadliest warrior. … And even they aren't that great.<br/><br/>The show itself takes an interesting, if unoriginal idea, of pitting warriors of different eras against each other. A few problems though.<br/><br/>1)Their experts are arrogant, ignorant, annoying and all too often deliver an opinion that is clearly scripted to create suspense and conflict. However, some of the guests to have impressive skills (I speak of course of the ninja guys).<br/><br/>2)The body of the show is filled with so much hyperbole, blatant romanticism, anachronisms, and unbearably 'Hollywood' attitude towards the whole thing that I can't even watch it.<br/><br/>3) Their tests are ludicrously poor.<br/><br/>4) The whole thing about the computer models is almost certainly BS (Sadly I cannot prove that.) On the other hand, the fight at the end can be pretty cool.<br/><br/>While this is certain to attract a certain type of viewer, watch only the first and last 5 minutes if you at all value the integrity of television. Explaining the premise of this show to someone is truly humiliating. I'd rather just not bring it up. For those who don't know, it's a "who would win" contest where they choose warriors from history who never had a chance to fight. Often times these warriors are separated by centuries or even millenia, but they try to make the matchups as fair as possible.<br/><br/>It's a fun show to watch. Certainly the best part of the show is watching the weapon experts at work. The horseback archery from Attila vs Alexander, the blademaster from William Wallace vs Shaka Zulu, and the quickdraw and trick shooting from Jesse James vs Al Capone come to mind as some of my favorite moments.<br/><br/>Unfortunately, it's got a lot of problems. They are very, very loose with historical accuracy, and often they do an awful job of picking weapons - especially with the modern day warriors. They rarely test armor and almost never test shields - only the Spartan and the Viking had a real shield test. The outcome is decided by a simulator which runs on magic, and the decisions are questionable at best.<br/><br/>The choreographed fights are hit or miss. Some are thrilling, like Apache vs Gladiator, but some are downright stupid, like Roman Centurion vs Rajput Warrior, where the Roman throws his shield aside for no reason halfway through. They also rarely, if ever, show actions in the choreographed fights that match up with the tests or results.<br/><br/>This is definitely "turn your brain off", guts, gore, and splodin'-style entertainment. Actually, who am I kidding? You already knew if you were going to watch this show when you read the synopsis. You are either the right audience, or you aren't.
Hair transplant surgery has become video conferencing for business very common nowadays. People are having hair fall. And among guys, it is seen very common. It is mainly because of the water they are using. Mostly everywhere there is water provided is very polluted. There are many side effects of hair transplantation too.
mainecosdei Admin replied
364 weeks ago